Chávez Clears the Road for Reelection AS/COA Online 02/18/09

Chávez will run for his second reelection in 2012. (AP Photo)

In a decisive electoral victory on February 15, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez won the right to run for his second reelection and possible third presidential term after voters approved an end to term limits. This is a political rebound for Chávez, who lost a proposed constitutional reform in December 2007 and important mayoralties in municipal elections last November. With this renewed mandate, he faces the daunting task to deal with rampant insecurity and corruption, rising inflation, and imminent economic adjustments to his vast social programs and fiscal expenditures.

Venezuelan electoral authorities announced that the “Yes” vote won by 54.86 percent of the “No” vote received 45.13 percent with a participation of more than 70 percent. International observers gave the referendum high marks for transparency and underlined the trustworthiness of the referendum’s official tally. But Chávez’s use of all state institutions and media at his disposal to push the amendment strained the process since the beginning. Chávez exerted pressure by emphasizing the lack of political alternatives and warning that Venezuela would crumble without his leadership, said pollster Luis Vicente León.

The opposition accepted their defeat with temperance and asked Chávez to turn his attention to the domestic agenda. Caracas’ Major Antonio Ledezma said that hopefully politicians “have turned that page of the political agenda” and that people “voted yes to solutions for garbage disposal, insecurity, inflation, and anarchy that overshadows governability.” In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Tal Cual Editor Teodoro Petkoff stressed important inroads made by winning 10 percent of the vote in this referendum in comparison to Chávez’s 2006 reelection victory margin of 64 percent. “And I don’t have the slightest doubt that the deterioration of Chavez’s support will continue through the next presidential election in 2012,” Petkoff adds.

Meanwhile, economists sound the alarm about the dangers laying ahead for the government due to falling revenue from oil exports and inflation. “I would say that Venezuela can count on a sizeable cushion of reserves and foreign exchange liquid assets to help it ride the current economic down cycle. But not for very long. By all accounts, Venezuela is destroying assets much more quickly than it’s been building them, given today’s oil prices,” says Eurasia Group’s Patrick Esteruelas in an AS/COA interview. The Financial Times reports that Chávez announced in his victory speech that he will redouble efforts to face the crisis; he was followed by his Finance Minister Ali Rodriguez, who cautiously referred to a stimulus package to control inflation but said that they are waiting to see at what level crude prices settle at to better determine their revenues for this year.

International leaders greeted Chávez’s victory at the polls positively. Colombian President Álvaro Uribe congratulated Chávez for his “democratic victory” in an effort to strengthen bruised bilateral relations. Spain’s government also praised the electoral outcome in Venezuela and urged for continued dialogue to bridge differences between the political parties, El Nacional reports. Even the U.S. government acknowledged the “civic spirit” displayed by Venezuelans and cautiously hailed Chávez’s accomplishment.

At a February 9 AS/COA panel discussion on the Venezuelan referendum, Barclays Capital Senior Economist for the Andes Alejandro Grisanti said that, even with a victory for Chávez on Sunday, he still must deal with harsh economic realities that could further harm his approval ratings when running for an hypothetical third term in 2012.

Read AS/COA extensive coverage on Venezuela’s electoral process and its oil-based economy.

Read the article as published at the AS/COA website.

Download a PDF file here

Chávez Tests Popularity AS/COA Online 02/12/09

Venezuelans decide about term limits for elected officials on February 15. (AP Photo)

As Venezuelan electoral workers set up voting stations and bottles of indelible ink for the February 15 referendum, the battle between the “Yes” and “No” sides heats up. On Sunday, Venezuelans head to the polls to decide whether President Hugo Chávez and all elected officials can run for reelection indefinitely. The referendum serves as a test of Chávez’s popularity at a time when inflation and crime rates have soared while falling oil prices threaten subsidies on food, fuel, and medical care. These social programs have thus far been the backbone of a strong chavista movement. But the opposition has made inroads as the economic cracks begin to show.

Yet the Venezuelan government remains confident on that regard, with Chávez claiming his country’s economy to be so strong that “[n]ot even a hair has been touched” by the global financial crisis. Despite his optimism, restructuring efforts are already underway. Citgo—a U.S.-based subsidiary of Petróleos de Venezuela S.A (PDVSA)—announced that it will cut its workforce of 3,762 by two percent, or approximately 75 employees. Additionally, PDVSA’s exploration and operational budget will be reduced between 30 to 40 percent in 2009, El Universal reports.

A new report by the Center for Economic and Policy Research offers up the country’s economic accomplishments in the areas of poverty reduction and GDP growth. But several experts and analysts take a less glowing view. “Venezuela is destroying assets much more quickly than it’s been building them, given today’s oil prices,” said Eurasia Group’s Patrick Esteruelas in an interview with AS/COA Online. Caracas-based Banco Mercantil recently predict that Venezuela’s economy will freeze and public financing could climb from $6.3 billion from last year up to $31.4 billion in 2009, reports Bloomberg.

The Economist offers a look at the political debate occurring among Venezuelans over the benefits of public services involving healthcare and subsidized food products against a backdrop of rampant crime and ballooning inflation. The lead-up to the vote has involved heavy polarization between the “Yes” and the “No” camps and even some violent outbreaks. On February 7, roughly one million people demonstrated in Caracas in support of the No vote and against an end to presidential term limits. Opposition leader Leopoldo López has urged voters to cast their ballots and repeat the December 2007 defeat of Chávez’s new constitution.

Chávez voiced his disapproval of the march but recognized that his followers should not downplay its importance and has gone as far as to condemn the actions of some supporters. A group of his most fervent followers, known as “La Piedrita,” staged teargas attacks on the Vatican diplomatic mission and the home of RCTV Director Marcel Garnier. They also went to so far as to make death threats against opposition leaders. Chávez responded to these actions with a hardened stance, labeling them terrorists and calling for the arrest of its leader Valentín Santana. Spanish newspaper El Pais published an interview with Santana in which he attempts to explain why his group declared some opposition leaders military targets. Additionally, the Venezuelan police arrested 11 suspects—including seven police agents—after a synagogue was attacked and ransacked by vandals on February 1.

At a February 9 AS/COA panel discussion on the Venezuelan referendum, Barclays Capital Senior Economist for the Andes Alejandro Grisanti said that, even if Chávez accomplishes a victory for Chávez on Sunday, he still must deal with harsh economic realities that could further harm his approval ratings when running for an hypothetical third term in 2011.

Sunday’s referendum may serve as Chávez’s last stand. Agencia EFE reports that Chávez vowed to recognize the electoral results, even in the case of defeat. The Venezuelan National Assembly announced that, should the “No” vote win out, the reelection proposal would no come up for another vote.

The Winter 2009 issue of Americas Quarterly features interviews with three candidates barred from running in the November 2008 legislative elections in Venezuela.

Read AS/COA interviews with Venezuelan opposition leader Leopoldo López and student activist Yon Goicoechea.

Read the article as published at the AS/COA website.

Download a PDF file here

Recession Strikes Immigrant Jobs, Remittances AS/COA Online 12/12/08

Immigrants struggle with fewer employment options. (AP Images)

In the midst of a financial storm, the U.S. labor market lost more than half a million jobs in November alone. While unemployment affects all segments of the population, legal and undocumented Latino workers have been particularly hard hit. The Hispanic unemployment rate hit 8.8 percent in October, outpacing the national figure of 6.5 percent.

The rising joblessness coincides with slowing remittance rates, delivering another blow to Latin American economies—particularly in Mexico and Central America—that depend on emigrant money flows. Remittances slowed down worldwide from a 16 percent annual increase in 2007 down to only seven percent in 2008. In October, the Inter-American Development Bank forecasted that this year, for the first time since 2000, remittances to Latin America would decrease in value when adjusted for inflation.

Given the circumstances, Latin American migrants to the United States find themselves contemplating the idea of returning home, faced with the difficulty of holding down jobs in hard-hit sectors such as construction as well as stiffer immigration enforcement that includes random workplace raids. The Philadelphia Inquirer reports about Latin American immigrants moving home, and notes that even circular migration across the border may drop as Mexicans return home permanently. A Pew Hispanic Center report from October found that the number of illegal immigrants entering the United States dropped from 800,000 per year between 2000 and 2004 to 500,000 per year in 2007. Additionally, immigration officials claim that tougher enforcement has helped reduced illegal immigration; more than 290,000 illegal immigrants were deported in 2007, which they say has induced others to consider the option of returning home.

Those who return or remain must also contend with economic consequences. NPR covers the struggles of poor residents in the Mexican state of Michoacán receiving fewer remittances from their relatives. The report also envisions problems for local governments if, for example, 10 percent of migrant workers decide to return. “No, there’s no work…there are some serious complications. This is reality,” State Legislator Antonio Garcia says.

However, the Associated Press reports that remittances to Mexico rose by $2.4 billion in October compared with $2.2 billion a year ago as Mexican immigrants sending money ahead of the Christmas season and cashing in on the declining value of the peso. That means more purchasing power in the hands of millions of families already strained by a weak economy. Despite this positive glimpse of recovery, the Economist explains that many workers might be sending home their savings in advance of their planned return.

In the United States, the immigration debate became a lesser issue in the 2008 presidential race and could be relegated to the back burner of Barack Obama’s presidential agenda, given the pressing need to confront the financial crisis. During his campaign, Obama promised to secure U.S. borders, reform existing immigration laws, and “bring illegal workers out of the shadows.” The recent nomination of Arizona’s Governor Janet Napolitano to the secretary of Homeland Security post by Obama is perceived as a strong sign that the next administration will eventually tackle immigration reform, given Napolitano’s expertise in border issues and immigration law.

The Migration Policy Institute recaps the top 10 immigration issues of 2008 and suggests which issues to keep an eye on in 2009.

Read AS/COA coverage on how the financial crisis has hit immigrant pockets this year.

En español.

Read the article as originally published at the AS/COA website.

Download a PDF file here.