Ethanol: Brazil Celebrates, United States Debates AS/COA Online 06/04/09

Pumping an ethanol blend at a Brazilian fuel station. (AP Photos)

São Paulo hosted the 2009 Ethanol Summit from June 1 to 3, featuring heavyweights such as President Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva’s Chief of Staff Dilma Roussef, Petrobras CEO Jose Gabrielli, and environmental activist and former U.S. President Bill Clinton. Speakers discussed new cellulose-based ethanol plants, forecasts of increasing ethanol usage in Brazil, and concerns about deforestation. Meanwhile, Colombia has become South America’s second biggest ethanol player and seeks to build its industry. In the United States, the discussion surrounding biofuels continues to focus on subsidies given to U.S. corn growers, corn-based ethanol’s impact on food prices, and tariffs imposed on Brazilian sugarcane-based ethanol.

At the summit, Roussef announced Brazil’s moves toward producing for commercial use cellulose-based (also known as second-generation) ethanol made mainly from woodchips and switchgrass. She also said Brazil hopes to start selling ethanol in that form domestically by the year 2012. Second-generation ethanol should capture almost 30 percent of the Brazilian market by 2020, according to the president of a private firm who spoke at the summit. Gabrielli trumpeted the fact that Petrobras will invest $2.8 billions in biofuels for the next four years and expects that ethanol will represent 75 percent of the Brazilian fuel market by 2020. But with such massive growth, questions surfaced about the dangers of deforestation. Clinton urged Brazil to take decisive steps to protect the rainforest, reduce its carbon footprint, and share its technology with potential ethanol producers like the Dominican Republic and Haiti. In December, Brazilian Environmental Minister Carlos Minc unveiled an ambitious plan to curb deforestation rates by 72 percent by 2017.

Colombia is also pinning hopes on increasing its stake in the ethanol market, given its position as the second largest producer in Latin America. Colombian Agriculture Minister Andrés Fernández said last month that, with six new projects dedicated to ethanol coming online this year, the country’s production capacity should increase twofold. He also said Colombia plans for a fifth of the cars made or imported to have engines using fuel made up 85 percent ethanol blend by 2012. Still, the increases use of ethanol elevates fears that prices on food containing sugar will rise, as they did happened last year in the United States with corn-related products, El Espectador reports.

In the United States, where corn-based ethanol dominates the industry, the debate continues. The Wall Street Journal reports on two federal studies that found corn-based ethanol carries a high price tag for consumers and questionable environmental advantages. In an article for BusinessWeek, automobile journalist Ed Wallace suggests “we must immediately drop the 51 cents per gallon blending credit for ethanol creation in America and drop the 54 cents per gallon tariff on imported Brazilian ethanol.” Lula and U.S. President Barack Obama discussed the 54-cent tariff imposed to Brazilian sugarcane-based ethanol by Washington during his March 14 visit to the White House without any effect. Obama said then that the measure “it is not going to change overnight” but hinted that “over time this source of tension can get resolved.”

Read the article as originally published at the AS/COA website.

The Americas 2008: A Year in Retrospective AS/COA Online 12/23/08

View a slideshow of the most compelling events in the hemisphere. Also, read an article by AS/COA Online Managing Editor Carin Zissis on the most riveting events affecting the Americas in 2008.

Click the image to watch the photo gallery.

Predicting U.S.-Brazil Ethanol Policy AS/COA Online 11/10/08

Byline shared with Carin Zissis.

An ethanol plant. Some firms have felt the crunch of rising production costs and lower prices. (AP Images)

With a new U.S. administration on the horizon, questions arise over opportunities for cooperation between Washington and Latin American countries in the field of biofuels. In particular, how will an Obama presidency affect collaboration and negotiations between the United States and Brazil in the field of ethanol?

In his latest Miami Herald column, Andres Oppenheimer suggests President-elect Barack shrink U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern oil by working with Brazil, Central America, and the Caribbean to produce sugar-based ethanol, which is both cheaper and better for the environment than the corn-based ethanol produced in the United States. During campaign season, the Obama-Biden ticket proposed working with leaders from across the hemisphere on a new “Energy Partnership for the Americas” to support of clean energy. Obama also voiced support for deepening relations with Brazil through developing markets for biofuels and promotion of “green” technology. The future president has praised Brazil, where more than 70 percent of cars are flex fuel, for providing a model for taking steps toward energy independence.

Yet Obama’s praise for the Brazilian biofuels industry may translate to supporting ethanol subsidies in the United States rather than reducing a tariff on Brazilian ethanol. Bloomberg reports that Obama will likely continue the current administration’s policies of subsidizing the industry, including tax credits.The cost of ethanol production has grown while more supplies of the fuel spell price drops. Less than a week before the November 4 election, VeraSun Energy, the biggest U.S. ethanol producer, filed for bankruptcy protection, according to the Financial Times.

In the past, Obama supported a 54 cent per gallon tariff on imports of sugar-based ethanol and voted for the Farm Bill, which maintains the tariff for two more years. The tariff has been a source of consternation for Brazil, which stands as the world’s biggest sugar-based ethanol producer. A New York Times article examines Obama’s ethanol policy on the campaign trail.

But in a May appearance on “Meet the Press,” Obama acknowledged that rising food prices could spur a policy change, saying, “[I]f it turns out that we’ve got to make changes in our ethanol policy to help people get something to eat, then that’s got to be the step we take.” Moreover, opportunities exist for cooperation with Latin American countries that would sidestep the tariff. By making use of its locations and a recently signed free-trade agreement with the United States, Peru stands poised to expand sugarcane-based ethanol production. AmericaEconomia reports that millions in investments from U.S., Brazilian, and domestic companies in northern Peru could lead to a production boost to supply the U.S. market, given that the FTA allows Peruvian products to enter the United States duty-free starting in 2009.

Meanwhile, Brazil’s ethanol industry could see short-term losses as a result of the credit crunch and related shrinking investments. Still, new deals are cropping up, such as a proposal by Archer Daniels Midland to invest $500 million over seven years in new sugar mills and boosting crop production in Brazil. Addressing a conference at the Organization of American States last month, former Brazilian Agriculture Minister and Co-Chairman of the Inter-American Ethanol Commission Roberto Rodriguez highlighted Brazil’s goal to increase the amount of sugarcane used in producing ethanol to 51 percent from the current level of 41 percent, offering growth and job opportunities.

In the Fall 2008 issue of Americas Quarterly, both Bolivian opposition leader President Jorge Quiroga and Gerdau Board Chair Jorge Gerdau Johannpeter suggest the next U.S. president should deepen ties with Brazil. Visit the new AQ website.

Read the original article published at the AS/COA website.

Download a PDF file here.