OAS Ponders Cuba’s Return AS/COA Online 05/29/09

A human rights protest in front of Havana’s capitol building. The OAS is assessing Cuba’s reentry, but Washington continues to raise rights concerns. (AP Photo)

As part of the White House’s more open approach to Cuba, the Obama administration made a move this week that could assist Havana’s readmissiont to Organization of American States (OAS). At a May 27 meeting of the Permanent Council of the OAS, the United States introduced a proposal to allow Cuba to eventually rejoin the organization. The move is in line with the warmer tone set by the Obama administration on Cuba; the White House has already eased travel and remittance restrictions for Cuban Americans and recommended restarting bilateral immigration talks. But Washington has indicated that Havana must adhere to the rules set out Inter-American Democratic Charter to gain readmission. It remains to be seen if Cuba will reciprocate by taking steps toward addressing political freedom and human rights issues.

Honduran and Nicaraguan delegations also submitted resolutions to pave the way for Cuba to rejoin. Costa Rica had intended to submit a plan, but one from the U.S. State Department replaced that country’s proposal, reports The Miami Herald. The OAS commissioned a working group to start deliberations based on the proposals and report back to the OAS General Assembly, which convenes in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, on June 2 and 3. The working group is expected to use the proposals “to find a consensus text for an eventual resolution on Cuba.”

The State Department’s decision to submit a proposal comes after the Fifth Summit of the Americas, when a number of hemispheric leaders called for Washington to improve relations with Cuba. Last week, U.S. Senator and Ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee  Richard Lugar (R-IN) said he does not believe Havana should gain instant readmission into the OAS without addressing rights issues, but that Washington must recognize concerns held by other countries at next week’s OAS summit. “There should be a way to harmonize the desire of many of our Latin American allies to reintegrate Cuba into the Inter-American system with the United States’ interest in reforming our policy towards Cuba,” said the senator.

At a May 27 press briefing, U.S. Department of State Spokesman Ian Kelly said the proposal submitted to the OAS “supports the OAS taking steps to initiate a dialogue with Cuba regarding its eventual reintegration into the inter-American system.” Still, the Obama administration has stated that Havana must abide by the OAS Inter-American Democratic Charter to gain readmission. “Any effort to admit Cuba into the OAS is really in Cuba’s hands,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on May 20. “They have to be willing to take the concrete steps necessary to meet those principles.” She made similar statements at COA’s Washington Conference on May 13. “We look forward to the day when every country in the Americas, including Cuba, can participate in our hemispheric partnerships in a manner that is consistent with the principles of the Inter-American Democratic Charter.”

At the same conference, Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) decried the idea of bringing Cuba back into the OAS fold without a dramatic improvement in human rights and democracy on the island. “For the OAS to readmit a regime that engages in this type of systematic suppression of human rights, it would have to rip up its Democratic Charter as a farce.” He also suggested that Washington cuts U.S. funding to the OAS in the case that it allow Havana to rejoin without undertaking democratic moves.

So far, Cuba has not indicated interest in rejoining. Earlier this week, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez said Havana was proud that it did not belong to the OAS, saying: “[T]he OAS is totally anachronistic; it serves other interests, and we feel that our path, Cuba’s path, is one of Latin American and Caribbean integration, without a presence from outside the continent.” However, just before Cuban President Raúl Casto hinted at a willingness to discuss human rights matters with the United States.

Writing for Americas Quarterly’s blog, AS/COA’s Senior Director of Policy Christopher Sabatini writes that, for the Obama administration, it is “better to try to loosen some elements of isolation to further what is the crux of U.S. policy towards the region: supporting the development of independent civil society and improvement in human rights on the island.”

In an AS/COA interview, OAS Secretary General José Miguel Insulza voiced support for overturning the 1962 resolution that ejected Cuba as a member country from the OAS. He also explains that if that happens, it would be just the first of many steps toward Cuba’s full reinstatement.

Listen to the audio of as AS/COA panel discussion on the Cuban diaspora.

View the article as originally published at the AS/COA website.

To Run or Not to Run: Uribe’s Question AS/COA Online 05/21/09

President Uribe still ponders a possible third term. (AP Photo)

Colombia’s Defense Minister Juan Manuel Santos steps down from his post on May 23 to become a presidential candidate for the 2010 elections. But there’s a catch: He’ll only declare his candidacy if President Álvaro Uribe chooses not to run for his second reelection. In an interview with Caracol Radio, Santos said that “he had the hunch that Uribe may not run” but that the president may not make his decision until October. Moreover, Colombia’s Senate approved legislation this week allowing a public referendum on whether President Álvaro Uribe should be allowed to run for his second consecutive reelection. The president may be delaying his decision in order to make the opposition seem weak and divided, thereby giving his party a boost on election day.

When Semana picked Santos as Colombia’s 2008 person of the year in December, the minister was already acting like a candidate on the road, offering gifts in various communities and inviting journalists to follow. In an interview with Cambio magazine this week, Santos reiterated his loyalty to Uribe and to upholding his democratic security policies if elected. Still, Santos finds himself competing for second place in popularity standings with former Medellín Mayor Sergio Fajardo. Other presidential hopefuls include former Agriculture Minister Andrés Felipe Arias, Ambassador Noemí Sanín, and the leader of the Cambio Radical political party Senator Germán Vargas Lleras.

During a September 2009 AS/COA luncheon, Uribe stated that “Colombia needs to reelect policies, not people.” Yet, eight months later, he remains ambiguous about his intentions. His approval ratings run above 70 percent and polls indicate he would likely win reelection. The Senate bill approving a reelection referendum earlier this week was passed by a 62-5 vote, though more than two dozen members of the opposition refused to participate. The bill needs to be reconciled with one from the house, then evaluated by the Constitutional Court. After clearing those hurdles, the referendum may be scheduled for some point in the fall.

Uribe’s popularity appears to stem from the fact that his administration oversaw the significant weakening of the Armed Revolutionary Forces of Colombia (FARC) and a period of economic renewal. In contrast, his high ratings have not been significantly damaged by recent wiretapping scandals involving Casa de Nariño and the Supreme Court, a cooling economy, or the extrajudicial killings of civilians by members of Colombia’s armed forces. “It may just be that they’re drinking Uribe’s Kool-aid,” comments the Latin American Thought blog in an analysis of recent poll data. The blog also suggests that Colombians place higher value on their security and economic issues than on democratic freedoms.

The idea of a third term for Uribe is a source of controversy for many. The Christian Science Monitor raises the question of whether Uribe is “following [Venezuelan President Hugo] Chávez’s footsteps?” In response, “Uribe has said he is only interested in seeing continuity for his security policies, but he has also hinted that he is the best one to do it,” the Monitor adds. Miami Herald’s columnist Andrés Oppenheimer says that Uribe should not run because “he would lose all moral authority to criticize Chávez and other elected autocrats who see themselves as ‘indispensable men’ and who end up destroying their countries’ institutions. There is no such thing as a good dictator, and Uribe would not be an exception to the rule.” The Economist reflects on the good and bad of Uribe’s two presidential terms but says: “If he doesn’t quit while he is still ahead, history may judge that Mr. Uribe began to undo his own achievement.”

Read the article as originally posted at the AS/COA website.